[Mcls-print-storage] Revised MOU for comments prior to ratification & sharing with directors

[Barbara J Cockrell]

Hi All, These were the only suggested revision that I'm aware of. I'll go ahead with these changes and send out that revised document later today for ratification at our Thursday phone meeting unless I hear anything from anyone else. Thanks, Barbara > To: "Barbara J Cockrell" <barbara.cockrell at wmich.edu>
> Cc: mcls-print-storage at mcls.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 10:26:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mcls-print-storage] Revised MOU for comments prior to
> ratification & sharing with directors
> Hello All,
> I went over the MOU in detail with Ellen Marks, our library director.
> She was very supportive of the document as it now stands with a few
> minor observations.
> 1. Duration of agreement section. She suggests we use "simple
> majority" rather than leave open to interpretation what constitutes a
> majority.
> 2.The references to SCS in the Description of the Project and the
> Appendix should follow the form: Sustainable Collection Services LLC
> (SCS)
> 3. She wanted to assurance that nothing about the data refresh implies
> we are bound to use the same consulting group, even if it is the most
> probable choice. I don't see anything that makes that implication.
> 4. Since we intend for our deans/directors or other campus
> administrators to sign the document, we need to include signature and
> date lines.
> Ellen Seidel
> Michigan Tech
> 906-487-3064
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Barbara J Cockrell <
> barbara.cockrell at wmich.edu > wrote:
> > All,
> > Attached is the reorganized and cleaned up version of the MOU
> > document
> > for your review. We hope this is a close to final draft so please
> > look
> > at it carefully.
> > We have also attached the 2 appended documents:
> > The SCS proposal for MCLS dated August 4 2011(is this the most
> > recent/relevant document Randy?)
> > and a revised Suggested lost/missing/damaged decision guidelines.
> > We wonder if the latter document really belongs with the MOU .
> > Perhaps
> > this and any other guidelines and best practices are more
> > appropriately dealt with as stand alone documents, perhaps attached
> > to
> > space on the MCLS site?
> > We are all of the opinion that developing the notification mechanism
> > for non-replaced items and also standardized bibliographic
> > identifiers
> > is beyond the scope of our work with the MOU and requires input from
> > all participants preferably at a future face to face meeting. While
> > it
> > is desirable to develop these before too long we think the MOU can
> > stand as it is at present without the specifics of those issues
> > necessarily having being defined.
> > We appreciate your suggestions, edits and comments,
> > Barbara
> > Dr Barbara Cockrell,
> > Associate Dean for Collections & Technical Services,
> > University Libraries,
> > Western Michigan University,
> > 1903, W. Michigan Ave,
> > Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5353
> > phone 269-387-5143
> > fax 269-387-5077
> > 'University Libraries: a recognized essential partner in enriching
> > and
> > elevating all aspects of scholarship at WMU'
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mcls-print-storage mailing list
> > Mcls-print-storage at lists.mlcnet.org
> > http://lists.mlcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mcls-print-storage
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mlcnet.org/mailman/private/mcls-print-storage/attachments/20120501/c50cc051/attachment.html